MDMB_6CL_ADBA - Wersja do druku +- Dopal.org - Forum Dyskusyjne o Używkach i RC (https://dopal.org) +-- Dział: Działy partnerskie (https://dopal.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +--- Dział: GR8CHEMS.IS (https://dopal.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=73) +--- Wątek: MDMB_6CL_ADBA (/showthread.php?tid=4695)

MDMB_6CL_ADBA - GR8 ChemS - 15.10.2024 Here write opinion of MDMB-6CL-ADB RE: MDMB_6CL_ADBA - horsii - 29.12.2024 GR8 ChemS  Just wanted to say this naming convention is absolute fucking nonsene. I mean it's not your fault, because it has been horribly wrong for many years, at least from when MDMB-4en-PINACA was called "5CL-ADB-A" and it is widely known as "5CL-ADB-A" - which is stupidest thing ever. There is no "5CL" (5-chloropentyl chain) in "5CL-ADB-A", it has pent-4-ene. There's no "ADB" in it, as it's the "MDMB" class, i'm oversimplifying it but it's not "ADB". And about that "-A" - no one even knows what it stands for.  "6CL" implies there's a longer chain than "5CL-ADB-A" but in fact it is the same thing as in the 5CL one. The only difference is in the "head" moiety, the 5CL has methyl 3,3-dimethylbutanoate  (from which the "MDMB" naming part actually comes from) and the "6CL" has some other retarded shit. It is in fact so stupid i won't even bother trying to abbreviate it. You can't both have the "ADB" and "MDMB" part in one compound. It's like naming a cannabinoid "5F-2201".